Cases 31 - 40 of 2,496
United States of America v. Mall
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Mall
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00452
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC and Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al. v. Quality Logistics & Installation
as 2:2024ms00009
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al.
Defendant:
Quality Logistics & Installation
Singleton v. Abram
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Paul Singleton
Defendant:
Precious Abram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mayweather Promotions LLC v. PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2024ms00008
Plaintiff:
Mayweather Promotions LLC
Defendant:
PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC
Counter Defendant:
Mayweather Promotions, LLC
Cross Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Morse & Associates, LTD
C. v. Rashid et al
as 2:2023cv02056
Defendant:
Jamal Rashid, Caesar's Entertainment, Inc., Mally Mall and others
Plaintiff:
C. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
S.C. v. Hilton Franchise Holding LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
S.C.
Defendant:
Hilton Franchise Holding LLC, N.W.H. Ltd., SSJV HOSPITALITY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Oberoi v. Airwire Technologies
as 3:2024ms00003
Plaintiff:
Anubhav Singh Oberoi
Defendant:
Airwire Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
