Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in Florida
Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Lonewolf v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 8:2019cv00295
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: VIOLETA LONEWOLF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TEETRICK v. Bank Of America NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv02061
Defendant: James E. Albertelli, P.A., Bank Of America NA and Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: ORIENT TEETRICK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baker v. Sepich et al
as 9:2018cv81595
Defendant: Bank Of America, N.A., Najarian Capital, LLC. and Oksana Sepich
Plaintiff: Tabitha Baker
Bank of America, N.A. v. Vaughn
as 5:2018cv00594
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Charles Vaughn, III
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
3Rd Party Defendant: Andreu, Palma & Andreu, PL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bank of America, N.A. v. Vaughn
as 6:2018cv01977
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Charles Vaughn, III
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
3Rd Party Defendant: Andreu, Palma & Andreu, PL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crespo v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 0:2018cv62030
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. and Aldridge Pite, LLP.
Plaintiff: Edward Crespo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McClendon et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 8:2018cv02047
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. and Carrington Mortgage Services
Plaintiff: Donald McClendon and Ryann McClendon
Undetermined: Jonathan C. Koch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mohammad et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2018cv23330
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: Feryal Mohammad and Wajdan Mohammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garron v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 0:2018cv61845
Plaintiff: George Garron
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amato v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 8:2018cv01462
Plaintiff: Michael Amato
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?