Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Williams v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2013cv00669
Plaintiff:
Naquelle Williams
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Deering v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 0:2013cv61161
Plaintiff:
MARY DEERING
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mooney v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Alicia Mooney
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Crystal Jackson
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fletcher v. Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
as 1:2013cv20468
Plaintiff:
Brandi Fletcher
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rogachesky v. Verizon Florida LLC et al
as 8:2012cv02744
Plaintiff:
William Rogachesky
Defendant:
Verizon Florida LLC and Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kubat v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2012cv01297
Plaintiff:
James Kubat
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kubat v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 6:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Kubat
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aumick v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 6:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Frederick S. Aumick
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC.
Mediator:
Daniel R. Levine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Aumick v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2012cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick S. Aumick
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC.
Mediator:
Daniel R. Levine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
