Cases 51 - 60 of 347
Williams v. Commerical Research & Recovery, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00847
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Commerical Research & Recovery, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristen Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Leonard v. Accounts Receivable et al
as 1:2018cv22417
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Leonard
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Israelson v. Enhanced Recovery Company
as 9:2018cv80688
Plaintiff:
Brian Israelson
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2018cv22016
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
James v. The Law Offices of Pollack & Rosen, P.A. et al
as 1:2018cv22006
Plaintiff:
Tonya James
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Pollack & Rosen, P.A., Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Underwood v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01190
Plaintiff:
Brittani Underwood
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc. , Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lovera v. Nationwide Bank
as 0:2018cv61007
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Lovera
Defendant:
Nationwide Bank and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Foote v. Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00690
Plaintiff:
Paula Foote
Defendant:
Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Davis v. Continental Service Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00676
Plaintiff:
Joann Davis
Defendant:
Continental Service Group, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barnes v. Harvard Collection Services Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Erica Barnes
Defendant:
Harvard Collection Services Inc. , Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
