Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 51 - 60 of 9,835
ZHONG et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2024cv01136
Petitioner: FEIFEI ZHONG and YILIAN LI
Respondent: UR M. JADDOU, CORLISS A JOSEPHS-CONWAY and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00837
Not Yet Classified: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MUSALEEV et al v. BITTER et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff: KHARIS MUSALEEV, ALINA MUSALEEVA, AMINA MUSALEEVA and others
Not Yet Classified: RENA BITTER, JULIE STUFFT, KRISTINA KVIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. DALY et al
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff: COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant: MARK DALY and JACK MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv01089
IN RE LETTERS ROGATORY
as 1:2024mc00042
IN RE LETTERS ROGATORY
as 1:2024mc00045
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00651
Not Yet Classified: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00579
Not Yet Classified: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OM v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff: GEORGIA OM
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?