Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tanner v. John C. Heath, et al.
as 3:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Whitney Tanner
Defendant:
John C. Heath dba Lexington Law, Progrexion Marketing, Inc., Efolks, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thornton v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv61449
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Comenity Bank, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heath W Thornton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Vergara v. Heath
as 0:2019cv61419
Defendant:
John C. Heath, Attorney At Law, PLLC d/b/a/ Lexington Law and John C. Health
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vergara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sessions v. John C. Heath, Attorney at Law
as 8:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
Nekuana Sessions
Defendant:
John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, D/B/A Lexington Law Firm and John C. Heath, Attorney at Law
Undetermined:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pena v. John C. Heath, Attorney At Law, PLLC
as 1:2018cv24407
Defendant:
John C. Heath, Attorney At Law, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elser v. John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, PLLC
as 5:2017cv00326
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elser
Defendant:
John C. Heath, Attorney at Law, PLLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Bryant v. Aargon Collection Agency, Inc.
as 2:2017cv14096
Plaintiff:
Heath Bryant
Defendant:
Aargon Collection Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
v. MINISALL et al
as 4:2017cv00114
Defendant:
MATTHEW MINISALL and JOHN C. HEATH, ATTORNEY AT LAW d/b/a LEXINGTON LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MINISALL v. HEATH
as 4:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MINISALL
Defendant:
JOHN C HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lamontagne v. Runyon et al
as 8:2013cv01948
Plaintiff:
David P. Lamontagne, Sr.
Defendant:
James C. Runyon, Frederick W. Heath , A.C.T.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
