Cases 1 - 10 of 25
City & County of San Francisco v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-17478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, ELAINE C. DUKE and others
County of Santa Clara v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-17480
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security and others
County of Santa Clara v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-16887
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
City and County of San Francis v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-16886
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
Belen Cabaccang, et al v. The United States Citizenship, et al
as 09-56089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BELEN CABACCANG and ISIDRO CABACCANG
Defendant - Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EVELYN M. UPCHURCH, Director of CIS Texas Service Center, MICHAEL AYTES, Action Deputy Director of CIS and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, EMILIO GONZALEZ, Director of CIS and ROARK L. DAVID, Director of CIS Texas Service Center
Amelyn Banares, et al v. Brian DeMore, et al
as 09-55913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMELYN G. BANARES and CARLOS M. SISON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN M. DEMORE, Acting Field Officer ICE, Los Angeles CA, JANE ARELLANO, Field Office Director, Los Angeles, CA, JONATHAN JOCK SCHARFEN, Acting Director, USCIS and others
Mike Abghari, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 09-55450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE ABGHARI and JALEH TADJDEH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, DONALD NEUFELD, Director, Citizenship and Immigration Service, California Service Center and others
National Lending Group, LLC, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 09-15166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL LENDING GROUP, LLC, an Arizona limited liability corporation and MILLENNIUM BANC, LTD
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and EDWARD D. SAAVEDRA, Jr., Acting Director of Industry Operations, Phoenix Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
Juan Reyes-Escobar v. Alberto Gonzales, et al
as 08-56601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN AUGUSTO REYES-ESCOBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Veterans for Common Sense, et al v. James Peake, et al
as 08-16728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE, a District of Columbia nonprofit organization and VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH, INC., a California nonprofit organization, representing their members and a class of all veterans similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. PEAKE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JAMES P. TERRY, Chairman, Board of Veterans Appeals and others
Amicus Curiae:
SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC., MILITARY SPOUSES FOR CHANGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
