Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DOE v. BURNS et al
as 1:2023cv02937
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. BURNS, DOUG VAN ZANDT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
DUNG v. EMMEL et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
CHIEM MINH DUNG
Defendant:
ALISSA EMMEL, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ISOM v. PAXTON et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
KEN PAXTON, SCOTT LEKAM, AVRIL HAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE SUBPOENA ISSUED TO BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022mc00108
In Re:
SUBPOENA ISSUED TO BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Respondent:
EUGENE BURNS
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03611
Defendant:
ROSALIND SARGENT-BURNS, KATHLEEN M. HAWK SAWYER, JEFFREY A ROSEN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BURNS v. ANDERSON
as 1:2016mc02509
Plaintiff:
DONALD A. BURNS
Defendant:
WALTER C. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
BURNS v. MCDONALD
as 1:2014mc01417
Plaintiff:
BRENDA BURNS
Defendant:
ROBERT MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE AND TOXICOLOGY et al v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE & TOXICOLOGY, INC. , MOMS AGAINST MERCURY, INC. , COMED, INC. and others
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION , MARGARET A. HAMBURG and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0348
MCDERMOTT v. BLANK et al
as 1:2012cv01777
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
REBECCA M. BLANK, ROBERT GROVES, CATHERINE H. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALYUTIN v. RICE et al
as 1:2011cv01597
Plaintiff:
ALEKSANDR MALYUTIN
Defendant:
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, WILLIAM BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
