Cases 1 - 10 of 17
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 17-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joe Norwood, J. Hollingsworth and others
Bannum, Inc. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-5353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bannum, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Catherine Scott, Timothy R. Barnett and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-5209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joe Norwood, J. Hollingsworth and others
Monzer Al Kassar v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-5134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Monzer Al Kassar
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., D. Scott Dodrill and United States of America
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016mc01154
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WILLIAMS v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016mc01098
Plaintiff:
DENNIS G. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MITCHELL v. SAMUELS
as 1:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
WALLACE G. MITCHELL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerome Hampton v. James Comey, et al
as 16-5058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerome Hampton
Defendant - Appellee:
James B. Comey, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, Anne Mary Carter, BOP Warden, Morgantown, West Virginia, Timothy J. Ervin, FBI Special Agent and others
LEVINE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al
as 1:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. LEVINE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and NEWTON KENDIG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016mc00273
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JOE NORWOOD, J. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
