Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Broward Bulldog, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2016cv61289
Plaintiff:
Broward Bulldog, Inc. and Dan Christensen
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20530 and Federal Bureau of Investigation, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20535
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Beach et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Jeff Beach , Joseph Danforth , Chrystal Eirhart and others
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Aumick v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
as 0:2012cv60295
Plaintiff:
Frederick S. Aumick
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Helmuth v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
as 9:2011cv81046
Plaintiff:
Bernadette M. Helmuth
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chen v. J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv60893
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth P. Chen
Defendant:
J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc. and LVNV Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walker v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
as 0:2011cv60496
Plaintiff:
Tamiko P. Walker
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
Mediator:
Samuel L. Heller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lhota v. Perez et al
as 2:2010cv00763
Plaintiff:
William G. Lhota
Defendant:
Clotilde Perez, Zenaida Perez, Timothy T. Lainhart and others
Counter_claimant:
Daniel McMahon
Counter_defendant:
William G. Lhota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Marshall v. J.C. Christensen and Associates, Inc.
as 0:2008cv61505
Plaintiff:
Lester J. Marshall
Defendant:
J.C. Christensen and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Yarbrough v. J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
as 0:2007cv60836
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Yarbrough and Donald A. Yarbrough
Defendant:
J. C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
