Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Coleman v. Direct Recovery Services, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Elle Gusman and Direct Recovery Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coleman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. McDonagh
as 1:2019cv04735
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Coleman McDonagh
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Sawicki v. Greene et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Sawicki, II
Defendant:
Martin J. Coleman, Courtney Ann Greene and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Halsted Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv05323
Plaintiff:
Malaika Coleman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Malaika Coleman
Defendant:
Halsted Financial Services, LLC, National Credit Adjusters, LLC and John Does 1-25, John Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coleman v. Trans Union, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01365
Defendant:
Bank of Missouri and Trans Union, LLC
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Coleman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lieberman v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brad Lieberman
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc., James Dimas, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Coleman v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01331
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coleman
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coleman v. Noble Voice LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06791
Plaintiff:
Harvey Coleman
Defendant:
Noble Voice LLC and Professional Diversity Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. State Farm Bank
as 1:2015cv01006
Plaintiff:
Sean Coleman
Defendant:
State Farm Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Coleman v. Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
as 1:2014cv03917
Plaintiff:
Dierdre Coleman
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
