Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Clark et al v. Everbank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Melanie Clark and Shawn Clark
Defendant:
Everbank, N.A. and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evans et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 8:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Ava Evans and Chris Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
RUSSELL v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
as 0:2021cv62302
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE RUSSELL
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RUSSELL, v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC,
as 1:2021cv23924
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE RUSSELL,
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Porter et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 8:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thurston Porter and Maria E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Hopson v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-2
Plaintiff:
John W Hopson
Gonzalez v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 8:2019cv00182
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Alison Gonzalez
Escarment et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 0:2018cv61477
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mckenzie Escarment and Loretta Escarment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Facey v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 0:2018cv61468
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric G. Facey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sobczak v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 6:2018cv00826
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dennis Sobczak
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
