Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ventura v. Combs et al
as 1:2023cv10098
Plaintiff:
Casandra Ventura
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment, Bad Boy Records and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Perez v. Does 1-10 et al
as 1:2022cv09662
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PEREZ
Defendant:
NYPD John/Jane Doe Officers 1-10, CITY OF NEW YORK and Police Officer John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Does No. 1-10 v. Nygard et al
as 1:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Nygard International Partnership, Peter J Nygard, Nygard Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Does No. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolhendler v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2019cv00457
Defendant:
Yaakov (Shulem) Vizel, Henry Grunbaum, Mark (Moishe) Silber and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wolhendler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanders et al v. Houslanger and Associates, PLLC et al
as 1:2017cv08985
Plaintiff:
Ramel Sanders and Antero Sarreal
Defendant:
Houslanger and Associates, PLLC, Todd E. Houslanger, Virgo Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04198
Defendant:
Rick D. Chandler, P.E., Frank Damiani, John And Jane Does Nos. 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L3 Technologies, Inc. v. EME Technology International, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02287
Defendant:
EME Technology International, Inc., John and Jane Does Nos. 1-10, Robert Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
L3 Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Walsh v. Family Aides Certified Services of New York City, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Defendant:
Arent Fox LLP, Brooklyn Grantor Trust, Family Aides Certified Services of New York City, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Walsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
