Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Attara v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 0:2024cv61465
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Attara
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Attorney General v. Freestone et al
as 8:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHLEY MOODY, ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and Attorney General
Defendant:
CALEB HUNTER FREESTONE, AMBER MARIE SMITH-STEWART, Gabriella Victoria Oropesa and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Heartbeat of Miami, Inc. v. Jane's Revenge et al
as 8:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Heartbeat of Miami and Heartbeat of Miami, Inc.
Defendant:
Jane's Revenge, Caleb Hunter Freestone, Amber Marie Smith-Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Elkin v. Hunter Warfield, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01124
Defendant:
Camden Royal Palms, LLC and Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Elkin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Faison v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 8:2018cv02293
Plaintiff:
Shawndra Faison
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cipolla v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 9:2018cv80528
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cipolla
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eady v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
Sadie Eady
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
