Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Mosby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.
as 1:2023cv07935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mosby
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 2:2022cv02273
Plaintiff:
Gary R Miller
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 1:2022cv07021
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Miller
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rolland v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2022cv04945
Plaintiff:
Brenda Rolland
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Flores-Kemmerer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kolleen Flores-Kemmerer
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Petitioner:
Trans Union, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hagood v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2018cv01510
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Edward Hagood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Suarez v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2018cv01206
Plaintiff:
Jorge Suarez
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seals v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2017cv08276
Plaintiff:
Bobby Seals
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Meyers v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2017cv07895
Plaintiff:
Eileen Meyers
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nesbitt v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2017cv07877
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Nesbitt
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
