Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wolfe v. Vermont Judicial Bureau
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kyle T. Wolfe
Defendant:
Vermont Judicial Bureau and Vermont Department of Taxes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Vermont Agency of Administration
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kyle T. Wolfe
Defendant:
Vermont Agency of Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dacres v. McGowan
as 2:2022cv00183
Petitioner:
Andre Dacres
Respondent:
Lakae T. McGowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Dakers et al v. Bartow et al
as 2:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Trevor Dakers and Lindsay Dakers
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Bartow , Pauline T. Bartow , Ken Bartow Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. Long et al
as 2:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas , Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Defendant:
George H. Long, Dawn Smith-Pliner, Ethan T. Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grundstein v. Mason et al
as 2:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Grundstein
Defendant:
William Mason, Gerald T. McFaul, Bob Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nawaz v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Nawaz and Malik M. Nawaz
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Boggero v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Giovanna Boggero and Giovanna Boggero
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
He et al v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00014
Plaintiff:
Zhi He and Qi Yue
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
