Cases 1 - 4 of 4
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 0:2020cv00234
Intervenor Defendant:
SOMMERS RANCH, LLC, State of Wyoming, MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO. and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, Western Watersheds Project and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 0:2020cv00231
Intervenor Defendant:
MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO., SOMMERS RANCH, LLC, PRICE CATTLE RANCH and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, AURELIA SKIPWITH, DAVID L. BERNHARDT and others
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, Western Watersheds Project, Sierra Club and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
WildEarth Guardians et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians , Powder River Basin Resource Council and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Forest Service , United States Forest Service Chief , United States Forest Service Acting Region II Forester and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
State of Wyoming, State of Wyoming and State of Wyoming
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture Secretary and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance and others
Amicu:
BlueRibbon Coalition, BlueRibbon Coalition, California Association of 4-Wheel-Drive Clubs and others
Intervenor:
Colorado Mining Association, Colorado Mining Association and Colorado Mining Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
