Cases 31 - 40 of 56
SEARLE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2018cv00692
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. SEARLE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2017cv02707
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
VOTEVETS ACTION FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2017cv02677
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
VOTEVETS ACTION FUND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2017cv02531
Plaintiff:
CLINT J. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CHAMBERS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2016cv00339
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. CHAMBERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2015cv01208
Plaintiff:
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DONNELLY et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2015cv00461
Plaintiff:
ELAINE DONNELLY and CENTER FOR MILITARY READINESS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PARRETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2015cv00197
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE D PARRETT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2014cv00776
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
