Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Martinair et al
as 1:2011cv06417
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
Martinair, Martinair Holland NV, Martin Air Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co. Ltd. v. APL Illinois et al
as 1:2011cv05578
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
APL Illinois, MOL Expeditor, APL Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
NIBA Home Rugs, Inc. v. Consiglio et al
as 1:2011cv03170
Plaintiff:
NIBA Home Rugs, Inc.
Defendant:
Kate Consiglio and Holland & Sherry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaSalle v. Holland et al
as 1:2011cv02077
Plaintiff:
Lillian LaSalle
Defendant:
Gill Holland and The Group Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanky v. Chong et al
as 1:2010cv04028
Plaintiff:
Frank Vanky
Defendant:
Yu Kwai Chong, Cing Wan Wong, Lie Xi Zhuang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Starkey v. Chong et al
as 1:2010cv03326
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Starkey
Defendant:
Yu Kwai Chong, Ching Wan Wong, Lie Xi Zhuang and others
Movant:
Brent Evans , Sidney Glick and Elaine Glick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sunline Express Systems, Inc. v. USF Holland, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01213
Plaintiff:
Sunline Express Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
USF Holland, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
USF Holland, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Sunline Express Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
American Home Assurance Company v. Martinair Holland N.V. et al
as 1:2007cv00981
Plaintiff:
American Home Assurance Company
Defendant:
Martinair Holland N.V. and Keuhne & Nagel, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Keuhne & Nagel, Inc. and Martinair Holland N.V.
Cross Defendant:
Martinair Holland N.V., Keuhne & Nagel, Inc. and Keuhne & Nagel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
