Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Garrett-Graham v. Geico, Insurance Agency, INC et al
as 1:2017cv21002
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Garrett-Graham
Defendant:
Geico, Insurance Agency, INC, American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Global Specialty Multi-Lines Underwriting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett-Graham v. Geico, Insurance Agency, INC et al
as 0:2017cv60549
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Garrett-Graham
Defendant:
Geico, Insurance Agency, INC, American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Global Specialty Multi-Lines Underwriting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
B&B Jewelry, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry LLC et al
as 1:2017cv20198
Plaintiff:
B&B Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Pandora Jewelry LLC and Franck Saragossi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Maurices Jewelers II, Inc. v. Pandora Jewelry, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv25079
Plaintiff:
MAURICES JEWELERS II, INC.
Defendant:
Pandora Jewelry, LLC and Pandora Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Miami Jewelry Exchange Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at LLoyds, London
as 1:2016cv24291
Plaintiff:
MIAMI JEWELRY EXCHANGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at LLoyds,London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jewelry Repair Enterprises, Inc. v. J. Keywater Investments, Inc. et al
as 9:2015cv80122
Defendant:
J. Keywater Investments, Inc., David Pillow and Kathy Pillow
Plaintiff:
Jewelry Repair Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Depaoli v. Exotic Motorcars and Jewelry, Inc.
as 9:2008cv80544
Plaintiff:
Michael Depaoli
Defendant:
Exotic Motorcars and Jewelry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Webster Business Credit Corporation v. Henricks Jewelry, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00601
Plaintiff:
Webster Business Credit Corporation and Webster Business Credit Corporation
Defendant:
Henricks Jewelry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
