Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Gould v. Cederoth et al
as 1:2013cv02145
Plaintiff:
James Gould
Defendant:
Andrew J. Cederoth , John D. Correnti , Michael N. Hammes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Carmichael v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv01625
Plaintiff:
John D. Carmichael
Defendant:
Tommy L. Davis, Beverly Davis, TLD Disposition Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System v. Baxter International Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System
Defendant:
Baxter International Inc , Walter E. Boomer , Blake E. Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Parkinson et al
as 1:2010cv07317
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Robert L. Parkinson, Walter E. Boomer, Blake E. Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salyers
as 1:2010cv07131
Plaintiff:
Patricia Salyers
Defendant:
Walter E. Boomer, Blake E. Devitt, John D. Forsyth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Barrall et al
as 3:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Neil A. Barrall and John D. Cavaletto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Dellagnese v. Messer et al
as 1:2009cv07195
Plaintiff:
John D Dellagnese, III
Defendant:
Joseph S Messer, Thomas R Stilp, Robert E. Surman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Ingram Mirco Inc. v. Marks et al
as 1:2009cv04432
Plaintiff:
Ingram Mirco Inc.
Defendant:
John D Marks and Ruth G. Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Garza v. Belton et al
as 1:2008cv01387
Plaintiff:
Richard Garza, Richard Garza and Richard Garza
Defendant:
Y. Marc Belton, Eugenio Clariond, John D. Correnti and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
