Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2018cv01604
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Plaintiff:
Michael H Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. TapImmune, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01497
Defendant:
TapImmune, Inc., Peter L Hoang, Joshua Silverman and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
ACC Industries, Inc. et al v. Solutionary, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00751
Plaintiff:
ACC Enterprises, LLC, ACC Industries, Inc., Calvada Partners, LLC and others
Defendant:
Steven Idelman and Solutionary, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Varga v. Findlay Automotive Group et al
as 2:2018cv00548
Defendant:
Joseph Delozier, Findlay Automotive Group, Findlay Automotive of Nevada, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Alexander Varga
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Szanto et al v. Szanto
as 3:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Evye Geller Szanto and Victor Alexander Szanto
Defendant:
Peter Szanto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gunn v. Wild
as 2:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Lezlie J. Gunn
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Lee v. Native Games America, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02665
Plaintiff:
Peter Lee
Defendant:
Jeff Martinez, Native Games America, LLC, Native Games Entertainment International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NOT USED
as 2:2016cv02304
Defendant:
Michael H Ponder and Hans-Peter Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2016cv02305
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Ponder
Defendant:
Dr. Hans Peter Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McFarland v. Long et al
as 2:2016cv00930
Defendant:
Louis A Hoch, Kenneth Keller, Peter G Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McFarland
Nominal Defendant:
Payment Data Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
