Cases 11 - 19 of 19
UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. Woodham
as 1:2011cv07734
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas M. Woodham
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
UBS AG et al v. Chernick et al
as 1:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
UBS AG , UBS Financial Service Inc. and UBS Securities LLC
Defendant:
Jeffrey Chernick and Simba International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galindo et al v. UBS International Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10004
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Albuquerque Galindo and Musp Servicos De Locacao, Ltda
Defendant:
UBS International Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kuznetsov v. UBS, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06345
Plaintiff:
Alex Kuznetsov
Defendant:
UBS, Inc. and UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
K Bank v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv04742
Plaintiff:
K Bank
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UBS International Inc. et al v. Itete Brasil Instalacoes Telefonicas Ltd. et al
as 1:2009cv04286
Interpleader Plaintiff:
UBS International Inc., UBS International Inc., UBS Financial Services Inc. and others
Defendant:
Itete Brasil Instalacoes Telefonicas Ltd. and Instalaciones De Telefonos, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Matheiu et al
as 1:2008cv10505
Petitioner:
UBS Financial Services Inc.
Respondent:
Adolfo Oscar Matheiu, Maria Ester Andreoli, Eduardo Ernesto Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Muro v. UBS Financial Services Inc.
as 1:2007cv06492
Plaintiff:
Gerard Muro
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Grauer v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv05450
Plaintiff:
Michael Grauer
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc., Thomas Reichert and Barry Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
