Cases 21 - 29 of 29
OJHA v. AGODIO et al
as 1:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
AJAY OJHA
Defendant:
ALBERIC AGODIO, AORE INVESTMENTS, INC., AORE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT FUND I, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
as 1:2011cv00696
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (TX) et al v. GIFFEN et al
as 1:2010cv01236
Plaintiff:
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (TX) and JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant:
JAMES H. GIFFEN, MERCATOR CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUBOIS v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK et al
as 1:2009cv02176
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS J. DUBOIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
LAW OFFICES OF ROSALIND R. RAY, PLLC v. FEDERAL EXPRESS et al
as 1:2008cv00775
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF ROSALIND R. RAY, PLLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARWOOD GROUP LLC v. HEALTH POLICY SOURCE, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01953
Plaintiff:
MARWOOD GROUP LLC
Defendant:
HEALTH POLICY SOURCE, INC., MONICA TENCATE, DANIEL BOSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
DOE v. UNNAMED LAW FIRM
as 1:2007cv01613
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNNAMED LAW FIRM
Counter Claimant:
JOHN DOE
Counter Defendant:
UNNAMED LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
DOE v. PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY v. ASSOCIATES FOR RENEWAL IN EDUCATION, INC. et al
as 1:2004cv01460
Plaintiff:
ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ASSOCIATES FOR RENEWAL IN EDUCATION, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
