Cases 21 - 28 of 28
GEIER et al v. CONWAY, HOMER & CHIN-CAPLAN, P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv01171
Plaintiff:
MARK R. GEIER and DAVID A. GEIER
Defendant:
CONWAY, HOMER & CHIN-CAPLAN, P.C. , JOHN H. KIM & ASSOCIATES, P.C. , LOMMEN, ABDO, COLE, KING & STAGBERG, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. RUSSELL
as 1:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND , JOHN KERR , ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant:
ROBERT S. RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv01671
Plaintiff:
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER , ALICE HYDE MEDICAL CENTER , ASHTABULA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01498
Plaintiff:
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER , ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL, INC. , BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. RUSSELL
as 1:2009cv01632
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant:
ROBERT S. RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KING v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON et al
as 1:2009cv01539
Plaintiff:
DENISE KING
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON and FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SHAWNCOULSON, LLP et al v. WOOD et al
as 1:2008cv01602
Plaintiff:
SHAWNCOULSON, LLP and KING LAW CORPORATION
Defendant:
ONEAL WOOD, POWERTRAIN, INC., WOOD SALES COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. OLVER et al
as 1:2007cv01646
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
RICHARD (DICK) L. OLVER, MICHAEL J. TURNER, WALTER P. HAVENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
