Contract Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
COLORADO HEART INSTITUTE, LLC et al v. LEVITT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01626
Plaintiff: COLORADO HEART INSTITUTE, LLC, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE, LLC, FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL HEART INSTITUTE, LLC and others
Defendant: MICHAEL O. LEVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Contract None
RICHARDS v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff: MARY RICHARDS
Defendant: OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION and ALVIN E. GROSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. OLVER et al
as 1:2007cv01646
Plaintiff: CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant: RICHARD (DICK) L. OLVER, MICHAEL J. TURNER, WALTER P. HAVENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
RWN DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC et al v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
as 1:2007cv01546
Plaintiff: RWN DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC, 1700 KALORAMA CONDOMINIUM LLC and RICHARD W. NAING
Defendant: TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
KEVIN S. BENNETT TRUST U/A THE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 2, 1989 et al v. BENNETT
as 1:2007cv01519
Plaintiff: KEVIN S. BENNETT TRUST U/A THE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 2, 1989, BRYAN G. BENNETT TRUST U/A/ THE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 2, 1989, BRYAN G. BENNETT and others
Defendant: ROBERT S. BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
JONES DAY v. SCRUSHY Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv00466
Plaintiff: JONES DAY and JONES DAY
Defendant: RICHARD M. SCRUSHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?