Cases 61 - 70 of 106
USA v. Woolley et al
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Dale B. Woolley, Todd T. Woolley and Discovery Dental Design
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Salt Lake City Corporation et al v. ERM WEST et al
as 2:2011cv01174
Plaintiff:
Salt Lake City Corporation, BP Products North America and Chevron USA Inc
Defendant:
ERM WEST, Compass Environmental and WRS Infrastructure and Environment a North Carolina corporation doing business as WRSCOMPASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hitachi Koki USA v. Schomas
as 2:2011cv01047
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Koki USA
Defendant:
Arthur John Schomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Tomlinson et al
as 2:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Randy Lee Tomlinson, Leeann Tomlinson and Clifford Gene Tomlinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA Talks.com v. Moskowitz et al
as 2:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
USA Talks.com
Defendant:
Mark Moskowitz, Harry Kim, Alan Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HearingLife USA v. Halligan et al
as 2:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
HearingLife USA
Defendant:
Guy Halligan and Kelly Halligan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilde et al v. Litton Loan Servicing et al
as 2:2010cv00318
Plaintiff:
W. Scott Wilde and Kimberlie Wilde
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing and HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Sorenson et al
as 2:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
John R. Sorenson and Anna E. Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff-Recovery of Debt to US
Osmond v. Litton Loan Servicing et al
as 1:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Margaret Osmond
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing and HSBC Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
