Cases 1 - 8 of 8
US Cargo Direct, Inc. v. PNC Bank NA
as 1:2022cv03925
Plaintiff:
US Cargo Direct, Inc.
Defendant:
PNC Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McLaughlin et al v. PNC Bank, NA
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Thomas McLaughlin , Paul Desmarteau and John DiGregorio
Defendant:
PNC Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
PNC Bank, NA, v. Plote et al
as 1:2014cv08129
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, NA
Defendant:
Raymond E. Plote , Janice Plote and Daniel Plote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PNC Bank, NA v. Rental System, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, NA
Defendant:
Rental Systems, L.L.C., Raymond E. Plote, Janice Plote and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Foster v. PNC Bank
as 1:2012cv03130
Defendant:
PNC BANK NA
Plaintiff:
Jeff Foster
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Northern Illinois Telecom, Inc., an Illinois corporation v. PNC Bank, NA, as successor in interest to National City Bank, as successor in interest to MidAmerica Bank, FSB
as 1:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Northern Illinois Telecom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Defendant:
PNC Bank, NA, as successor in interest to National City Bank, as successor in interest to MidAmerica Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PNC Bank, NA, successor to National City Bank, successor in interest by merger to MidAmerica Bank, FSB, successor in interest by merger to EFS Bank v. River Park Place, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company et al
as 1:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, NA, successor to National City Bank, successor in interest by merger to MidAmerica Bank, FSB, successor in interest by merger to EFS Bank
Defendant:
River Park Place, L.L.C., Kurt Kresmery , Daniel R. Plote and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC Bank, National Association v. OHCMC-Oswego, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00301
Defendant:
OHCMC-Oswego, LLC and Camille O Hoffman
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
