Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RBS Citizens NA v. Mughal Bakery, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07199
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
Mughal Bakery, Inc. and Kareemunnisa Begum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RBS Citizens NA v. Jeil Machinery, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv07169
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
Jeil Machinery, Inc and Ken Hae Choi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RBS Citizens NA v. SPDD Associates et al
as 1:2009cv07164
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
SPDD Associates and Perry Veney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RBS Citizens NA v. Impressive Warehouse Services, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv07173
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
Impressive Warehouse Services, LLC and Constantine Dussias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RBS Citizens, NA v. P & M Wellness Group, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02746
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
P & M Wellness Group, LLC and Michelle Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RBS Citizens, NA v. A. P. Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02740
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
A. P. Development, Inc. and Piotr Piechnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
RBS Citizens, NA v. Concord Xpress Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01840
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
Concord Xpress Logistics, Inc., Michael Ayache and Christian Papana
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RBS Citizens, NA v. Neeta Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv06427
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
Neeta Enterprises, Inc. and Neeta Shariffi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RBS Citizens, NA v. Dammam Int'l Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv06426
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
Dammam Int'l Enterprises, Inc. and Ali A Shariffi
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
