Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al
as 1:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Ronald Kisling, Fastly, Inc., Richard Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Sweitzer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Stanley et al v. Live Ventures, Incorporated
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
John Locke and Richard Stanley
Defendant:
Live Ventures, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cooke v. Bartlett et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Defendant:
Nolan Bederman, Richard A. Bartlett, Christine R. Deister and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Cooke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lowenberg v. Fishman et al
as 1:2024cv00841
Defendant:
Tap AI Inc. and Mark Fishman
Plaintiff:
Richard Lowenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cooper et al v. Bellasalma et al
as 1:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Stardust389, Inc., Christopher H. Cooper and Airlock389, Inc.
Defendant:
Divyesh Makwana, Carie Elena Edwards, David Traub and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hogan v. Altman et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hogan
Defendant:
Elizabeth Altman, Gregory Garrison, Shih-Yin Ho and others
In re Bioxcel Therapeutics, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith and Janice Korff
Defendant:
Vimel Mehta, Peter Mueller, June Bray and others
Baker v. Romano et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rick Wilmer, Roxanne Bowman and others
Bowling v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Maren K. Bowling
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernstein, Maren K. Bowling and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
