Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shaw v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Shaw
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Shaw et al v. Ferrugio Design, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Todd Shaw and Rachelle Shaw
Defendant:
Ferrugio Design Inc. doing business as Ferrugio Design + Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01368
Defendant:
Todd Shaw, Rachelle Shaw, Ferrugio Design, Inc. a California Business dba Ferrugio Design + Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Linda Shaw
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Evans v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01988
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
LVMPD Officer Cindy Fasulo, LVMPD Officer Doe Fasulo, LVMPD Officer Dennis Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw Group Holdings LLC et al v. CAS Residential LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00618
Defendant:
CAS Residential LLC and Consolidated American Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shaw Group Holdings LLC, Mandelbaum Family LLC and Bruce Monzulla
Cause Of Action: Diversity
D.E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios, L.L.C. et al v. Archon Corporation
as 2:2007cv01146
Plaintiff:
D.E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios, L.L.C., LC Capital Master Fund, LTD., LC Capital/Capital Z SPV, LP and others
Defendant:
Archon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Corrales et al v. Castillo
as 2:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
Diego Corrales, Diego Corrales, Diego Corrales and others
Defendant:
Jose Luis Castillo and Jose Luis Castillo
Movant:
Fernando Beltran and Fernando Beltran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
