Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jones
Defendant:
Jagdeep Singh, Timonthy Holme, Kevin Hettrich and others
Baker v. Romano et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rick Wilmer, Roxanne Bowman and others
CCM Associates II LLC v. Channel Control Merchants LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
CCM Associates II LLC
Defendant:
Channel Control Merchants LLC, HDC Holdings II, LLC, KKR & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & P Logistics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
M & P Logistics Inc. and Kulwant Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Balfour et al v. iFIT Health and Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Scott Balfour, Don Lee, Kuldeep Singh and others
Defendant:
iFIT Health and Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Harbor Associates Limited Partnership et al v. Micron Devices, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01706
Plaintiff:
Multi - Decades Trust doing business as Harbor Associates Limited Partnership, Kapex I, LLC, Dr. Krishna P. Singh doing business as Harbor Associates Limited Partnership and others
Defendant:
Micron Medical Corporation, Micron Devices, LLC, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Khaleeluddin v. Fardis et al
as 1:2018cv00469
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Khaleeluddin
Defendant:
Maria Fardis, Iain Dukes, Merrill A McPeak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Team Finance, LLC v. Singh
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Team Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Sandesh Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandhu et al v. 7-Eleven Inc.
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Sakattar Singh Sandhu , Paramjit Kaur Sandhu , Rosie Sandhu and others
Defendant:
7-Eleven Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
