Cases 11 - 20 of 499
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, aewoyry, amho480 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, acutastore, alexas345 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Blue Sphere, Inc. et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Blue Sphere, Inc. d/b/a Lucky 13, Robert A. Kloetzy and Blue Sphere, Inc. doing business as Lucky 13
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations d/b/a The Domain Names Identified on Schedule A, The Partnerships and Unincorporated Asociations doing business as The Domain Names Identified on Schedule A, anticipateh.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd. v. THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A"
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", B.DANDONG03, MOUSE DREAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Knox Associates, Inc. v. Knox FRC, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Knox Associates, Inc. d/b/a The Knox Company and Knox Associates, Inc. an Arizona corporation doing business as The Knox Company
Defendant:
Knox FRC, Inc. and John R. Miles
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
The Ridge Wallet LLC v. Suzhou Niu Mo Wang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Nimalist and Normest
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
The Ridge Wallet LLC
Defendant:
Suzhou Niu Mo Wang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Nimalist and Normest
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, Foshanshiqiqiaotongnianfushi Co., Ltd. d/b/a S H Baby, Ruping YU d/b/a Chiirp best and others
Amicus Curiae:
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, MINGTIANN, shengjundianzishangwuyouxiangongsi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ABHI-store, AiYiGo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
