Cases 11 - 17 of 17
GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
as 1:2014cv00878
Plaintiff:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC and SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Limited
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Glenmark Generics Ltd. et al v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Glenmark Generics Ltd. and Glenmark Generics Inc. USA
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC , GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Stiefel Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Apotex Inc.
as 1:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Defendant:
Apotex Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Management Limited et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 1:2011cv01284
Plaintiff:
GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Management Limited and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Mylan Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00789
Plaintiff:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Defendant:
Mylan Inc. , Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Impax Laboratories Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Mylan Inc. and Impax Laboratories Inc.
Counter_defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Roxane Laboratories Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Defendant:
Roxane Laboratories Inc. , Watson Pharma Inc. , Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Roxane Laboratories Inc.
Counter_defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Defendant:
Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Anchen Inc. and Banner Pharmacaps Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Anchen Inc. and Banner Pharmacaps Inc.
Counter_defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
