Cases 191 - 200 of 295
Rekluse Motor Sports, Inc., an ID corporation v. Drussel Wilfley Design, LLC, a CO corporation
as 1:2010cv00537
Defendant:
Drussel Wilfley Design, LLC, a CO corporation
Plaintiff:
Rekluse Motor Sports, Inc., an ID corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Clip Ventures LLC v. U-Dig-It Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Clip Ventures LLC
Defendant:
U-Dig-It Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Yaskot v. Intermountain Natural, LLC
as 4:2010cv00490
Plaintiff:
Gregory Yaskot
Defendant:
Intermountain Natural, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hakes et al v. RJB Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hakes and Mark L. Anderson
Defendant:
RJB Company, Inc., Ronald J. Boudreau, Judy Boudreau and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Price Products, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Price Products, LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation and IQ Accessories
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Automated Solutions, Inc. et al v. Fadal Machining Centers, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00344
Plaintiff:
Automated Solutions, Inc. and CNCPros.net, Inc.
Defendant:
Fadal Machining Centers, LLC and MAG Industrial Automation Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Shymatta v. Teleforce USA, Inc
as 4:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
David Shymatta
Defendant:
Teleforce USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PakSense, Inc. v. QA Supplies, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
PakSense, Inc
Defendant:
QA Supplies, LLC and Tempsen Electronic Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Paksense, Inc. v. Evidencia, LLP et al
as 1:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
PakSense, Inc
Defendant:
Evidencia, LLP, American Thermal Instruments Company and Information Mediary Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hill v. Trico Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Defendant:
Trico Construction Inc. and Randy L. Barrrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
