Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Entertainment One UK Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Entertainment One UK Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, Chachi Piruli, Ideenbaeckeri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Changzhou Daya Import & Export Corp., Ltd., Dongguan Qunyi Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Jeff Bartels
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ITNRSIET Direct, ABEUTY and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jeff Bartels
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, gedeyumaoyiyouxianzerengongsi, BGHKDFSKLDF1DSFJHF and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Entertainment One UK Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Entertainment One UK Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, BEIJING DAKAILE IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADING CO., LIMITED, Chengdu Shuzhongchuang Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
John Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv07134
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Thyggzjbs, fanquingyue 123123 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ABC Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06704
Plaintiff:
ABC Corporation and ZAG America, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, EAST (XUZHOU) IMPORT & EXPORT TRADE CO,.LTD, Guangdong Chengxin Garments Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Monster Energy Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06524
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Autumn wind 123 Store, BABY 521 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SEMK Products Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv06365
Plaintiff:
SEMK Products Limited
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, AOCHU Store, Blessed Life Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Those Characters from Cleveland, LLC v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv06007
Plaintiff:
Those Characters from Cleveland, LLC
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, Ah yuan coolest magical Store, Ah yuan creative imaginative Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
