Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Keystone Global LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2015cv08883
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keystone Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jinno International USA LLC v. T-Bags LLC et al
as 1:2015cv08651
Plaintiff:
Jinno International USA LLC
Defendant:
T-Bags LLC, Saks & Company LLC, Amazon.Com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Fascinations, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.
as 1:2015cv06068
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fascinations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Galbraith & Paul, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05919
Plaintiff:
Galbraith & Paul, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Adrianna Papell LLC and Desire LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Villeroy & Boch A.G. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00464
Plaintiff:
Villeroy & Boch A.G.
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Forni v. Resnick, et al.
as 1:2014cv09458
Defendant:
Joshua Resnick , Shutterstock Inc , Playboy Enterprises Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Forni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leading Edge Novelty, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04453
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leading Edge Novelty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
LEADING EDGE NOVELTY, INC. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 9:2014cv04453
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LEADING EDGE NOVELTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hair Flair Limited v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04508
Plaintiff:
Hair Flair Limited
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sorias et al v. National Cellular USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02897
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Yeoshua Sorias and Zilicon Accessories LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
