Cases 51 - 55 of 55
Jones v. Roc-A-Fella Films, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03648
Plaintiff:
Antonne Jones
Defendant:
Roc-A-Fella Films, Inc., Lion's Gate Films, Inc., Damon Dash and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. 229 Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03507
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Frankie Beverly, Miran Publishing, Inc. and others
Defendant:
229 Restaurant, Inc. and Steven Juliano
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jamie Music Publishing Co. et al v. Roc-A-Fella Records, LLC et al
as 1:2005cv09922
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc., Juelz Santana, Diplomatic Man inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Barbara Mason
Plaintiff:
Jamie Record Company, Jamie Music Publishing Co. doing business as Dandelion Music Co. and Dartown Inc. doing business as Stilran Music
Intervenor Defendant:
Jamie Music Publishing Co. and Dartown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Authors Guild et al v. Google Inc.
as 1:2005cv08136
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Herbert Mitgang, Betty Miles and others
Appellant:
Lewis Hyde, Harry Lewis, Open Access Trust Inc. and others
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Jack Beerman, Privacy Authors and Publishers, Gary Rhoades and others
Not Classified By Court:
David Meininger, Harold Bloom, Elliot Abrams and others
Interested Party:
Olswang LLP and United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
New York Law School, Institute for Information Law and Policy, Computer and Communications Industry Association, Consumer Watchdog and others
Trustee:
Peter Gollasch
Intervenor:
Harrasowitz, Media24, Norstedts Forlagsgrupp AB and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Brodie v. Columbia Records, et al
as 1:2003cv04396
Plaintiff:
Hugh Brodie
Defendant:
Columbia Records, Robert Diggs, Gary Grice and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
