Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Narita Trading Co., Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03499
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Narita Trading Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Blagman v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05453
Plaintiff:
Norman Blagman
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc., Google Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ontel Products Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04610
Plaintiff:
Ontel Products Corporation
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Mint, Inc. v. Shokomoko et al
as 1:2010cv09394
Plaintiff:
Mint, Inc.
Defendant:
Shokomoko and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Leutwyler v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04910
Plaintiff:
Henry Leutwyler
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Fandino v. Amalgam Entertainment, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv08325
Plaintiff:
Catherine Fandino
Defendant:
Amalgam Entertainment, LLC, Amalgam Digital, Inc., E1 Entertainment U.S. LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Koo v. Hammacher Schlemmer & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv04987
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Bits & Pieces, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jung-O Koo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saratoga Films Inc. v. Navarre Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv08407
Plaintiff:
Saratoga Films Inc.
Defendant:
Navarre Corp., Netflix Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gusler v. Fischer et al
as 1:2007cv09535
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gusler and Timothy Gusler
Defendant:
Matthew Fischer, Salvatore Guerreri, Peter J. Listro Associates, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
