Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Coach Services, Inc. v. Bagsnyc.com et al
as 1:2009cv04660
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Bagsnyc.com and David H. Sepulveda
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. K Ya International Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04656
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
K Ya International Inc. and Qi Z Yu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. Merit Trading Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04661
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Merit Trading Inc. and Jie Lequ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. Chen
as 1:2009cv04662
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Lun Sheng Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. Adammas.Mybisis.com et al
as 1:2009cv04246
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Adammas.Mybisis.com and Leticia Segura
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. Sunglassreplicas.com et al
as 1:2009cv04245
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Sunglassreplicas.com, Sequoia Air Freight and Joseph Coates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. Hanil Import & Export, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03294
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Hanil Import & Export, Inc., Kwang C. Chung and David Im
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coach Services, Inc. v. CCT Wholesale et al
as 1:2009cv03471
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
CCT Wholesale, Qiu R Li Li, Ai Hua He and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coach Service, Inc v. Pacheco
as 1:2009cv03290
Plaintiff:
Coach Service, Inc
Defendant:
Manuel Pacheco
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
