Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nguyen v. Corporation of Western Governors University
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anhvu C. Nguyen
Defendant:
Corporation of Western Governors University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (religion)
Avus Holdings v. Muir et al
as 2:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Next Distributions LLC, Patrick C. Muir and Next Distributions Inc
Plaintiff:
Avus Holdings
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Bright Path Enterprises v. C&S Holmes et al
as 2:2018cv00550
Plaintiff:
Bright Path Enterprises
Defendant:
Christine Holmes, C&S Holmes, Wiley Post and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solpals et al v. Handstands Promo
as 2:2018cv00241
Plaintiff:
Solpals and C-Slide Holdings
Defendant:
Handstands Promo
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Rudder Holding Company et al v. Christensen et al
as 2:2017cv00678
Plaintiff:
Rudder Holding Company and Iceberg Franchising
Defendant:
F. Kelly Christensen , Anchor Holding Company , 4C Shake Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hartsun Quantum Supplements v. Denmark et al
as 2:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hartsun Quantum Supplements
Defendant:
Theodore C. Denmark and Kathleen L. Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Applied Asphalt Technologies v. Sam B Corp et al
as 2:2014cv00800
Plaintiff:
Applied Asphalt Technologies
Defendant:
Sam B Corp, John W. Burdick, Kenneth Burdick and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
True Science et al v. Mars et al
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
True Science , TruRX , M&C USA and others
Defendant:
Mars and Kal Kan Foods
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Terry et al v. Hinds et al
as 2:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Terry and BodyGym
Defendant:
Robert S. Hinds, Lifeline International and Lifeline USA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
A Cute Baby v. RTK Management et al
as 2:2011cv00991
Plaintiff:
A Cute Baby
Defendant:
RTK Management, Sagebrook Holdings, Devin C. Bybee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
