Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CHS, Inc. et al v. Nusser Fuels LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
CHS, Inc. and CHS McPherson Refinery, Inc.
Defendant:
Nusser Fuels LLC, James Nusser, Tracy Nusser and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
W. Chappell Music Corp. et al v. Blue Moose Topeka, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv04093
Plaintiff:
W. Chappell Music Corp. doing business as WC Music Corp. and Round Hill Music Royalty Fund LP doing business as Round Hill Songs
Defendant:
Blue Moose Topeka, LLC, Klaton Restaurants, LLC, KC Hopps, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Gabriel Homes, Inc. v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2023cv02294
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Alfredo J. Rodriguez, Mariana Rodriguez, Alberto Santiago Mena and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Vetstem Biopharma, Inc. v. Enso Discoveries LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02267
Defendant:
Kansas Regenerative Medicine Center LLC, Patrick Farley, Enso Discoveries LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Vetstem Biopharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tomelleri v. CafePress, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02239
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Tomelleri
Defendant:
CafePress, Inc., David M. Booth, James A. Ehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kansas Livestock Association v. Pfrang et al
as 2:2013cv02587
Plaintiff:
Kansas Livestock Association
Defendant:
David E. Pfrang , James Dobbins and Kansas Beef Council, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Morris v. Sheridan's Franchise Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02655
Plaintiff:
David D. Morris
Defendant:
Sheridan's Franchise Systems, Inc. and James Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Design Basics, L.L.C. v. Strawn et al
as 2:2009cv02614
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, L.L.C.
Defendant:
James Strawn, Strawn Contracting, Inc., Strawn Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
