Intellectual Property Cases filed in Utah
Kings Pond Enterprises v. Vermeyen
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff: Kings Pond Enterprises
Defendant: Vermeyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
King's Pond Enterprises v. Britt
as 2:2017cv00295
Plaintiff: King's Pond Enterprises
Defendant: Joey Britt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
King's Camo v. King et al
as 2:2016cv00277
Plaintiff: King's Camo
Defendant: Robert King , Monster Camo and Monster Innovations
Counter_claimant: Monster Innovations , Robert King and Monster Camo
Counter_defendant: King's Camo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
King's Pond v. South Mission Online
as 2:2016cv00235
Plaintiff: King's Pond
Defendant: South Mission Online
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
1-800 Contacts v. Contact Lens King
as 2:2010cv00205
Plaintiff: 1-800 Contacts
Defendant: Contact Lens King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Conk v. Jordan Outdoor Enterprises et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00005
Plaintiff: Nathan T. Conk and Nathan T. Conk
Defendant: Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Haas Outdoors, King's Shadow Camo and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
CleanCut v. Bee King Canada
as 2:2008cv00735
Plaintiff: CleanCut and CleanCut
Defendant: Bee King Canada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PC Consulting v. King's Creek Plantation
as 1:2008cv00060
Plaintiff: PC Consulting and PC Consulting
Defendant: King's Creek Plantation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?