Cases 1 - 10 of 19
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG. et al v. ARIGNA TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
as 1:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG. and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Defendant:
ARIGNA TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
DONIS v. DUBAI MUNICIPALITY et al
as 1:2016cv02501
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO DONIS
Defendant:
DUBAI MUNICIPALITY and THYSSENKRUPP AG
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
NOVARTIS AG et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA et al
as 1:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG and NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA and INTAS PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
NOVARTIS AG et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA et al
as 1:2011cv01631
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG and NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA and INTAS PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NOVARTIS AG et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00821
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG and NOVARTIS CORPORATION
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
NOVARTIS AG v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00659
Plaintiff:
NOVARTIS AG
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and MORPHOSYS AG
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
TELES AG et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
TELES AG and SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS, S.A. v. NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS SRL et al
as 1:2010cv01620
Plaintiff:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS, S.A.
Defendant:
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS SRL and NOVARTIS AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
KUROS BIOSURGERY AG v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01173
Plaintiff:
KUROS BIOSURGERY AG
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
