Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lashify, Inc. v. Pro Lash, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lashify, Inc.
Defendant:
Pro Lash, Inc., Bella Lash Extensions LLC d/b/a Pro Lash, Zachary Chipman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Trove Brands LLC et al v. Jia Wei Lifestyle Inc
as 2:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Trove Brands, LLC d/b/a The BlenderBottle Company, Runway Blue, LLC, Trove Brands LLC A Utah limited liability company doing business as The Blenderbottle Company and others
Defendant:
Jia Wei Lifestyle, Inc. and Jia Wei Lifestyle Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Dewey D v. Progressive Dental Marketing
as 4:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
Dewey D
Defendant:
Progressive Dental Marketing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Clay v. McLaughlin et al
as 4:2018cv00064
Defendant:
Casey McLaughlin and Gregory D. McLaughlin
Plaintiff:
David Clay
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
exocad GmbH v. B&D Dental et al
as 2:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
exocad GmbH
Defendant:
B&D Dental and Daniel Jung
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Deseret Digital Media v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Deseret Digital Media
Defendant:
Richie Carter, Butch B. Cullens, Jay D. Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
B&D Dental v. International Dental Solution
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
B&D Dental
Defendant:
International Dental Solution
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Hancock et al v. Vialink
as 1:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Hancock and Christopher N. Schenck
Defendant:
Vialink
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Hancock v. Hisun Motors
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Hancock and Christopher N. Schenck
Defendant:
Hisun Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
11th Avenue v. Group Dealz et al
as 2:2014cv00822
Plaintiff:
11th Avenue
Defendant:
Group Dealz and Jared D. Smith
Counter_claimant:
Jared D. Smith and Group Dealz
Counter_defendant:
11th Avenue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
