Cases 151 - 160 of 10,223
Askia v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02172
Plaintiff:
Taiji Askia
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vanburen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Tyler A Vanburen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Balleza y Balleza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Ymelda Balleza y Balleza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Wendt v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WENDT
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Tracey L Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Grose v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin D Grose
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Toolooze v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04046
Plaintiff:
Aaron Toolooze
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stafiej v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02005
Plaintiff:
Mary Stafiej
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoxie v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hoxie
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dominguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff:
Byran I. Dominguez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
