Cases 11 - 20 of 822
Castle v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00557
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Wendy Castle
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Aragon v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00529
Plaintiff:
David M Aragon
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benenfits
Birtha v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00521
Plaintiff:
Aaron Birtha
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Heald v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Marci L. Heald
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watkins v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00517
Plaintiff:
Mark Watkins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davison v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00470
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davison
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martinez v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00469
Plaintiff:
Marie Martinez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fernandez v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00376
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Fernandez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Trichak v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00374
Plaintiff:
Megan Trichak
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peppito v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Danielle Peppito
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.