Cases 11 - 20 of 19,625
Quesada v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv21908
Plaintiff:
Milagros Quesada
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Cindy Kay Martel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hepburn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE HEPBURN
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stotts v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv21051
Plaintiff:
Tia Stotts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Mesoraca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv14151
Plaintiff:
Roxane Mesoraca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fernandez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv21877
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Fernandez
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
McMinn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Pamela May McMinn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kennen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Albert Joseph Kennen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Uselton v. Commissioner
as 8:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Cody Uselton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. Portales
as 1:2024cv21833
Claimant:
Ms Yanet Portales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
