Cases 31 - 40 of 262
Ducret v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv00739
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Brenton D. Ducret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00947
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kuwaliski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00034
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Kuwaliski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00821
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dennis D. Hyder
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00823
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trussell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv02429
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stephanie D. Trussell
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00886
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv00592
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Terry D Daniel and Terry D. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Ross D. Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Calbetzor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Calbetzor
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
