Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Santos v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
MARISOL SANTOS
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Palacios Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2022cv62096
Plaintiff:
Herisbel Palacios Santos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Santos Santana v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv02626
Plaintiff:
Linda Santos Santana
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Diaz-Reyes v. Saul
as 0:2019cv62954
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Santos Diaz-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv01945
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
APRIL SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv03033
Plaintiff:
Julio Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santonil v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Alicia Santos Santonil
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Santos Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santos v. Colvin
as 9:2017cv80064
Plaintiff:
Lisa F. Santos
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Santos Bixby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2016cv02468
Plaintiff:
Sally Jo Santos Bixby
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
